C/Oasis
  Book News   |   About C/Oasis   |   Poetry Submissions   |   Sunoasis Jobs   |   Classifieds   |   Writer's Notebook   |   LETTERS  
Return to Oasis

Ezines

Andante
Beliefnet
Blue Ear
Central Europe Review
Context
Exquisite Corpse
FrontPage
Gadfly
Killing the Buddha
Mighty Organ
Nerve
PopPolitics
Praxis Post
Spark-online
Spike
Web del Sol

Offerings!

Laughing Sun
C/Oasis

Original Work! 

Political Meditations
Billboard
Current events
Resources!
Classifieds
Jobs!
- 

[W r i t e r' s N o t e b o o k]

One of the best exercises for a writer is to lower himself into the texture of time. What is thirty years to five thousand? And yet, what if in those thirty years a few moments have been taken to contemplate the great mystery of five thousand years of and for itself, as well as its relation to a mere thirty years?

* * * * * * * *

The bitterness of women. The bitterness of women! Like a beautiful snake in the bush.

* * * * * * * *
Mass culture is the desire for poetry but not poetry.

It is the critic who is obsessed with his own immortality. That is why he quickly finds the tools of reduction and make them his own. But, in doing so, he has destroyed any ability to live into the future. And he always learns too late.

Criticism reveals a mind in limbo, in purgatory; not ready for heaven and not brave enough for hell. It always has the intention or secret wish that with a little more penetration, a little more impetus, a paradise will be found within itself.

* * * * * * * *
The writer always asks himself, "in all this reading you've done, how much of it has actually freed your spirit or your mind?" From what into what? A lot of knowledge is there simply to maintain simple or complex relations. There's no doubt that understanding in one way of getting over superstitious fears of one kind or another. But, what if in getting over those fears, he grows complacent to the real problems at hand?

And what does all the knowledge avoid? Look at the forms in which knowledge is taken in, the instincts that are indiscriminate in the beginning. Call it instability but call it the form of the time.

* * * * * * * *

Those thinkers who are in for "conditioning" and "engineering" the society are all over their heads. Invariably they would condition that aspect of themselves which is beyond understanding. They will condition the fallible understanding of the individual, the "abstract" part that is an empty place anyway. Abstract thinking as distinct from pure thinking. Abstraction is an inherited thought and thrown down onto the plastic mind. Where is it thrust from? By whose directions? To what end? Sometimes these appear to be significant questions.

* * * * * * * *
It is the sweetest irony that those who thought they knew it all, thought they could predict the end of time, who scorned truth, scorned beauty, destroyed the paths to truth, adopted highly cynical and suspect philosophies, they are now on the defensive, now obscure and without support. They, in effect, did themselves in after they had devoured all good that they could find.

The writer gave up entertainment many years ago. What is paramount in this most demeaned, decimated age, is a path to meaning. The writer's rightful place in on that path. Entertainment belongs to billion dollar enterprises that weave some magic and vanishes. Entertainment is contrived in a way that makes it unappealing, mere child's play. The most difficult thing is to find a path to the infinite and, in fact, a path back to the transitory. The path to the infinite is probably easier but a good discipline.

Back to Top
Back to This Month's Notebook
Back to Jobs Page
Back to Working Writer
Back to Oasis


David Eide
eide491@earthlink.net 
© 2002 David Eide. All rights reserved.